alex rodriguez exceeds low expectations by sounding human in his apology over his past steroid use. i wonder how this will be received generally.
go hank aaron.
Monday, February 9, 2009
Saturday, February 7, 2009
dreams are silly
i think i am really enjoying the fact that i'm not playing fantasy sports at the moment. the football season ended so well - my teams finished 1,1,2,3,10 - that it doesn't really matter that the one terrible team was in the league that matters the most. you have to wonder sometimes if it's time to just give up. i do have a streak of 3 straight years winning a championship on my primary account - that's 3 championships in 8 leagues - so maybe it's worth taking a shot at keeping that up. i've kicked around the idea of doing a half-season baseball league; i get so bored of fantasy baseball. i have also found that it's still pretty entertaining to read about fantasy basketball (which i have never actually played) without having a team. no pressure, all fun. maybe not as much fun as running a team when it's going well...but football is probably the one fantasy sport that's the most enjoyable and that i'm most likely to continue playing.
Thursday, January 8, 2009
ultimate matchup
arizona vs oklahoma for the bcs championship next year.
nearly impossible, but one can wish
nearly impossible, but one can wish
Monday, December 15, 2008
there's a playoff team here somewhere
four of my five teams made the playoffs, and in the two leagues with 4-team formats i am in the championship. one has a two-week playoff system, with semifinals from wk 14-15 and finals from wk 16-17. Personally, I could see some value in completing all playoff games by week 15.
The other two leagues offer a ridiculous format in which 8 of 10 teams made the playoffs. One of these was edited by the commissioner late in the season, with no warning. Confusing that league with the other 8 playoff team league, I initially thought I was misreading things and that the playoff format had not actually changed. Thus, I kept quiet, as no one else said anything. That is shocking to me; most of these guys know each other, from what I understand. I started playing with them last year via a friend who knew last year's commish. Maybe they were all as confused as I was. My 3rd-seeded team made the semifinal round, but if that hadn't happened, how lame would it have been? Playing a #6 team that shouldn't have been in the playoffs at all and losing? Wow.
The other thing that bothers me is divisions in fantasy leagues. If there are divisions, which serve absolutely no justifiable purpose, the playoffs should be straight seeded tournaments. We hear sports pundits talking about seeding as the best way to do real sports playoffs. However, in the real sports world you have some great geographic rivalries preserved and fostered by divisional groupings. Taking away the division champions' automatic playoff bid would take some of the fun out of those rivalries. Is there any reason at all to grant automatic playoff bids to division champions in fantasy? No, especially not in a public standard configuration league where you're playing with strangers and the arrangement is certain to be a one-year thing. The problems grow with the size of the league, a real tragedy since larger fantasy leagues are more challenging. How would you like to miss out on the playoffs despite having one of the best records in your hyper-competitive tough league just because you're unluckily in the strongest division? That just shouldn't happen.
The other two leagues offer a ridiculous format in which 8 of 10 teams made the playoffs. One of these was edited by the commissioner late in the season, with no warning. Confusing that league with the other 8 playoff team league, I initially thought I was misreading things and that the playoff format had not actually changed. Thus, I kept quiet, as no one else said anything. That is shocking to me; most of these guys know each other, from what I understand. I started playing with them last year via a friend who knew last year's commish. Maybe they were all as confused as I was. My 3rd-seeded team made the semifinal round, but if that hadn't happened, how lame would it have been? Playing a #6 team that shouldn't have been in the playoffs at all and losing? Wow.
The other thing that bothers me is divisions in fantasy leagues. If there are divisions, which serve absolutely no justifiable purpose, the playoffs should be straight seeded tournaments. We hear sports pundits talking about seeding as the best way to do real sports playoffs. However, in the real sports world you have some great geographic rivalries preserved and fostered by divisional groupings. Taking away the division champions' automatic playoff bid would take some of the fun out of those rivalries. Is there any reason at all to grant automatic playoff bids to division champions in fantasy? No, especially not in a public standard configuration league where you're playing with strangers and the arrangement is certain to be a one-year thing. The problems grow with the size of the league, a real tragedy since larger fantasy leagues are more challenging. How would you like to miss out on the playoffs despite having one of the best records in your hyper-competitive tough league just because you're unluckily in the strongest division? That just shouldn't happen.
Saturday, November 29, 2008
keep it irrelevant
you gotta hate thursday games when your opponent puts up 101 points on you thanksgiving day and still has 2 WRs, an RB, and his TE going. that's right, i have the privilege of playing this week against someone who had westbrook and also got 41 points out of Bironas and the Tennessee defense. usually, i have no idea what happened with my fantasy teams until i wake up monday morning. it's a lot worse having to thing about the fact that you'll need to score a hundred thirty points or so in order to win. i've already lost twice in a row and fallen from first to third in the past two weeks; i'll be fourth if this guy beats me. i'll have a lot more time to wish that wasn't inevitable thanks to those thursday games.
Saturday, November 15, 2008
roscoe
a guy i play with in several leagues added roscoe parrish for this weekend's game. this is in a twelve team league where we play 3 receivers. i feel like he just pulled this move out of nowhere, which seems to make little sense. it's impressive though, just because no one would really think of doing it. it's like when i made some trade for hunter pence early in the baseball season, and people in my league thought i was just throwing in the towel or something. i gave up greinke and hawpe, having picked hawpe up off of waivers. one guy was a little heated and posted a note to the entire league complaining that i was apparently giving up. hunter pence was ranked in the top 50 players going into the season; he never performed at that level, but this was too early to give up on that. i figured greinke was overachieving; he was, but not as much as i'd thought. hawpe really isn't that great in a 10 team league, and i just loved the power/speed/average of...hunter pence. a coworker in that league was annoyed but more taciturn on the subject of the trade. he just didn't understand the logic behind a trade involving three players he considered irrelevant. picking up roscoe parrish feels like that. it just doesn't seem like there's a reason to do it.
Friday, November 14, 2008
the pats defense erased my ipod
a couple of awful things happened in the past 24 hours. the ipod touch died on the way to work, preventing me from reading up on fantasy football. all the music disappeared this afternoon. oh, and the patriots defense tried repeatedly to give away the game at home against the jets, only succeeding in overtime.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)